Deonte Spicer v. Anthony Satterelli
OFFICER ANTHONY SATTERELLI, OFFICER J. BROWN, OTHER UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, at all times acting in their individual capacities under color of federal law and OFFICER A. CUNNINGHAM |
DEONTE SPICER |
19-6675 |
May 8, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00010-GMG-RWT. Mailed to: Deonte Spicer. [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/20/2019 05:48 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed [1000515834] granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 5 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Deonte Spicer. [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/20/2019 05:47 PM] |
Filing 5 MOTION by Deonte Spicer to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [5]. Date and method of service: 05/15/2019 US mail. [1000515763] [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/20/2019 04:22 PM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00010-GMG-RWT. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/08/2019 05:07 PM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Deonte Spicer. Informal Opening Brief due 06/03/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/08/2019 02:52 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Deonte Spicer ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Deonte Spicer. [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/08/2019 02:50 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00010-GMG-RWT. Case manager: JMoore. [19-6675] JHM [Entered: 05/08/2019 02:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.