Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
Defendant / Appellee: LISA D. NESBITT, SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States and REDMOND K. BARNES
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
Case Number: 19-6743
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2019 Filing 7 Returned mail received from Dontez Lamont Simuel re [ # 6 ] for failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? Document refused by Appellant (second time); document not re-sent. [1000543057] [19-6743] KS [Entered: 07/08/2019 03:21 PM]
June 25, 2019 Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Dontez Lamont Simuel re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Dontez Lamont Simuel. [19-6743] KS [Entered: 06/25/2019 03:52 PM]
June 25, 2019 Filing 5 Returned mail received from Dontez Lamont Simuel re [ # 4 ] for failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? Document was refused by Appellant; document re-sent to same address [1000536671]. [19-6743] KS [Entered: 06/25/2019 03:50 PM]
June 12, 2019 Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Dontez Lamont Simuel re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Dontez Lamont Simuel. [19-6743] KS [Entered: 06/12/2019 03:38 PM]
May 23, 2019 Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Dontez Lamont Simuel ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Dontez Lamont Simuel. [19-6743] KS [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:30 PM]
May 23, 2019 Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03017-BO. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6743] KS [Entered: 05/23/2019 12:00 PM]
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03017-BO. Case manager: KStump. [19-6743] KS [Entered: 05/23/2019 11:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dontez Simuel v. Scott Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LISA D. NESBITT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REDMOND K. BARNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DONTEZ LAMONT SIMUEL
Represented By: Dontez Lamont Simuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?