Cassie Crisano v. Stafford County
| SHERIFF DAVID DECATUR, DEPUTY JOSEPH S. MASSINE and DEPUTY MCCULLOUGH |
| CASSIE C. CRISANO |
| 19-6982 |
| July 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Cassie C. Crisano. Consent to Payment Form: No; Trust Account Statement: No. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 08/07/2019 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Cassie C. Crisano re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/31/2019 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 PLRA-CONSENT TO PAYMENT form by Cassie C. Crisano. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/30/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 PLRA/IFP-TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT (court access only) by Cassie C. Crisano. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/19/2019 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00698-CMH-JFA. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/10/2019 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Cassie C. Crisano ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Cassie C. Crisano. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/09/2019 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/23/2019. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/09/2019 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-00698-CMH-JFA. Case manager: JRice. [19-6982] JR [Entered: 07/09/2019 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
