Dwayne Baker v. Harold Clarke
| DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker |
| HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VDOC |
| 19-7026 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by DeWayne Baker. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 08/23/2019 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 13 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by DeWayne Baker. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 08/23/2019 03:47 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER filed [1000554333] deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel until briefing complete [ # 7 ]. Copies to all parties.. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 04:19 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed [1000554326] granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 8 ] Number of days granted: 14. Informal Opening Brief due 08/22/2019. Copies to all parties.. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 04:17 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Docket correction requested from DeWayne Baker. Mailed to: D. Baker. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION by DeWayne Baker to IFP (insufficient). Date and method of service: 07/24/2019 US mail. [1000554310] [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION by DeWayne Baker to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 07/24/2019 US mail. [1000554307] [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION by DeWayne Baker to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 07/24/2019 US mail. [1000554303] [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 Letter by DeWayne Baker . [1000554299] [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/25/2019 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: D. Baker. Informal Opening Brief due 08/08/2019 [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/15/2019 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to DeWayne Baker - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 08/14/2019. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00620-JLK-JCH. Mailed to: D. Baker. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/15/2019 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00620-JLK-JCH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?No [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/15/2019 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 7:18-cv-00620-JLK-JCH. Date notice of appeal filed: 07/12/2019. Case manager: CathyHerb. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-7026] CT [Entered: 07/15/2019 12:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dwayne Baker v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker | |
| Represented By: | DeWayne Baker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VDOC | |
| Represented By: | Richard Carson Vorhis |
| Represented By: | Ann-Marie Catherine White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
