Frank Gainey v. Erik Hooks
Respondent / Appellee: ERIK A. HOOKS and DAVID MILLIS
Petitioner / Appellant: FRANK GAINEY, a/k/a Farrakhan Bey
Case Number: 19-7169
Filed: August 12, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 9, 2020 Frank Gainey v. Erik Hooks

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2019 Filing 8 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-hc-02147-D. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? N/A. [19-7169] TW [Entered: 09/18/2019 10:02 AM]
September 17, 2019 Filing 7 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 10/01/2019. [19-7169] TW [Entered: 09/17/2019 12:15 PM]
September 16, 2019 Filing 10 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Frank Gainey. [19-7169]--[Edited 09/20/2019 by CT, filing error, document struck]--[Edited 09/25/2019 by TJP - fixed entry-restricted format ] CT [Entered: 09/19/2019 01:18 PM]
September 11, 2019 Filing 9 Letter requesting forms by Frank Gainey . [1000590949] [19-7169] CT [Entered: 09/19/2019 01:14 PM]
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER filed [1000584068] deferring action on Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Frank Gainey [5]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Frank Gainey. [19-7169] CB [Entered: 09/09/2019 04:25 PM]
September 9, 2019 Filing 5 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Frank Gainey. [19-7169] CB [Entered: 09/09/2019 04:24 PM]
September 9, 2019 Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Frank Gainey. [19-7169] CB [Entered: 09/09/2019 04:23 PM]
August 12, 2019 Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: F. Gainey. Informal Opening Brief due 09/05/2019 [19-7169] CT [Entered: 08/12/2019 03:34 PM]
August 12, 2019 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Frank Gainey - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 09/11/2019. Originating case number: 5:18-hc-02147-D. Mailed to: F. Gainey. [19-7169] CT [Entered: 08/12/2019 03:29 PM]
August 12, 2019 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-hc-02147-D. Date notice of appeal filed: 08/09/2019. Case manager: CathyHerb. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-7169] CT [Entered: 08/12/2019 03:17 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Frank Gainey v. Erik Hooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ERIK A. HOOKS
Represented By: Clarence Joe DelForge III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID MILLIS
Represented By: Clarence Joe DelForge III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: FRANK GAINEY, a/k/a Farrakhan Bey
Represented By: Frank Gainey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?