John Walters v. Michael Martin
JOHN T. MURPHY |
MICHAEL MARTIN, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center |
JOHN WALTERS |
19-7391 |
October 2, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by John Walters. [19-7391] AB [Entered: 11/26/2019 09:45 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 4 ] Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 11/27/2019. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: John Walters HUTTONSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER P. O. Box 1 Huttonsville, WV 26273-0000, Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich and Sarah Bethany Massey. [1000607532] [19-7391] AB [Entered: 10/16/2019 11:29 AM] |
Filing 4 MOTION by John Walters to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 10/10/2019 US mail. [1000607523] [19-7391] AB [Entered: 10/16/2019 11:25 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: John Walters HUTTONSVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER P. O. Box 1 Huttonsville, WV 26273-0000, Sarah Bethany Massey, and Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich. Informal Opening Brief due 10/28/2019. [19-7391] AB [Entered: 10/02/2019 11:11 AM] |
Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-cv-00096-FPS. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [19-7391] AB [Entered: 10/02/2019 11:10 AM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-cv-00096-FPS. Date notice of appeal filed: 10/01/2019. Case manager: ABrownlee. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [19-7391] AB [Entered: 10/02/2019 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.