Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Norfolk Police Department
| J. R. OYOLA, Detective and NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Police Operation Center |
| RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR. |
| ALEXANDER KAY, Detective |
| 19-7783 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Randy Lassiter Jr. [19-7783] AW [Entered: 01/06/2020 07:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-01462-LO-MSN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-7783] AW [Entered: 12/06/2019 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 12/19/2019. [19-7783] AW [Entered: 12/05/2019 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Randy Lassiter Jr. Informal Opening Brief due 12/30/2019 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-7783] AW [Entered: 12/05/2019 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Randy Lassiter Jr. [19-7783] AW [Entered: 12/05/2019 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-01462-LO-MSN. Case manager: AWalker. [19-7783] AW [Entered: 12/05/2019 09:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
