Kenneth Hinton v. Joseph Atkins, III
BRIAN DAVID SHEFFERMAN and JOSEPH PRESTON ATKINS, III |
KENNETH HINTON |
19-7903 |
December 30, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-02203-GJH. Mailed to: Kenneth Hinton. [19-7903] TW [Entered: 01/07/2020 12:52 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER filed granting motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 6 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Kenneth Hinton. [1000657132] [19-7903] TW [Entered: 01/07/2020 12:51 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION by Kenneth Hinton to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6]. Date and method of service: 01/02/2020 US mail. [1000657128] [19-7903] TW [Entered: 01/07/2020 12:50 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-02203-GJH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [19-7903] TW [Entered: 01/06/2020 08:41 AM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 01/13/2020. [19-7903] CT [Entered: 12/30/2019 10:21 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 01/23/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [19-7903] CT [Entered: 12/30/2019 10:20 AM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Kenneth Hinton ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: K. Hinton. [19-7903] CT [Entered: 12/30/2019 10:15 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-02203-GJH. Case manager: CathyHerb. [19-7903] CT [Entered: 12/30/2019 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.