In re: Brandon Jennings
| In re: BRANDON MARQUIS JENNINGS, a/k/a Smilez, a/k/a Smilez Finesse, a/k/a Beezy, Mustafa Beezy Bey |
| 20-1351 |
| March 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from Brandon Marquis Jennings. Mailed to: Brandon Marquis Jennings. [20-1351] JR [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Brandon Marquis Jennings - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 04/08/2020. Originating case number: 5:18-cr-00318-FL-1. Mailed to: Brandon Marquis Jennings. [20-1351] JR [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-cr-00318-FL-1. Case manager: JRice. [20-1351] JR [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of prohibition filed by Brandon Marquis Jennings. [20-1351] JR [Entered: 03/24/2020 11:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Brandon Jennings | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: BRANDON MARQUIS JENNINGS, a/k/a Smilez, a/k/a Smilez Finesse, a/k/a Beezy, Mustafa Beezy Bey | |
| Represented By: | Brandon Marquis Jennings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
