In Re: David Smith
Petitioner: In re: DAVID LEE SMITH
Case Number: 20-1395
Filed: April 7, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2020 Filing 5 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by David Lee Smith. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [20-1395] RE [Entered: 04/07/2020 10:46 AM]
April 7, 2020 Filing 4 Docket correction requested from David Lee Smith.. Mailed to: David Smith. [20-1395] RE [Entered: 04/07/2020 10:43 AM]
April 7, 2020 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03020-D. Mailed to: David Smith. [20-1395] RE [Entered: 04/07/2020 10:36 AM]
April 7, 2020 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:17-ct-03020-D. Case manager: REdwards. [20-1395] RE [Entered: 04/07/2020 10:32 AM]
April 6, 2020 Filing 3 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by David Lee Smith. [20-1395] RE [Entered: 04/07/2020 10:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In Re: David Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: DAVID LEE SMITH
Represented By: David Lee Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?