In re: Fred Johnson
| In re: FRED LEE JOHNSON |
| 20-148 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from Fred Lee Johnson. Mailed to: Fred Johnson. [20-148] AW [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)) Originating case number:. Mailed to: Fred Johnson. [20-148] AW [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Fred Lee Johnson. Is PSR available on district court docket? NA. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? NA. [20-148] AW [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: N/A. Case manager: AWalker. [20-148] AW [Entered: 02/14/2020 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Fred Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: FRED LEE JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Fred Lee Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
