Angelic Hofler v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANGELIC BOULERICE HOFLER
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 20-1535
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed suspending briefing Copies to all parties. [1000749933] [20-1535] AW [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:22 PM]
June 2, 2020 Filing 10 COURT ORDER filed granting Motion for abeyance. [ # 9 ] Case 20-1535 placed in abeyance pending decision in 19-1529 Probst v Saul from Current appellate court. Copies to all parties. [1000749932] [20-1535] AW [Entered: 06/02/2020 04:21 PM]
June 1, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION by Andrew Saul to place case in abeyance.. Date and method of service: 06/01/2020 ecf. [1000748938] [20-1535] David Mervis [Entered: 06/01/2020 02:06 PM]
May 20, 2020 Filing 8 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Angelic Boulerice Hofler. [20-1535] John Goss [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:43 PM]
May 20, 2020 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Angelic Boulerice Hofler. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000742394] [20-1535] John Goss [Entered: 05/20/2020 12:42 PM]
May 19, 2020 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by John O. Goss for Angelic Boulerice Hofler. [1000741604] [20-1535] John Goss [Entered: 05/19/2020 11:59 AM]
May 13, 2020 Filing 5 BRIEFING ORDER filed.. FILING OF PAPER COPIES OF BRIEFS/APPENDICES IS SUSPENDED PENDING FURTHER NOTICE FROM THE COURT. Opening Brief and Appendix due 06/22/2020. Response Brief due 07/22/2020 [20-1535] AW [Entered: 05/13/2020 07:18 AM]
May 12, 2020 Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Andrew Saul. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [20-1535] David Mervis [Entered: 05/12/2020 03:08 PM]
May 12, 2020 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David N. Mervis for Andrew Saul. [1000737664] [20-1535] David Mervis [Entered: 05/12/2020 01:20 PM]
May 8, 2020 Filing 2 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases) . Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? Yes Administrative Record (Social Security) due 05/22/2020. [20-1535] AW [Entered: 05/08/2020 09:50 AM]
May 8, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1000735811-2 ] social security case Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00050-BO. Mailed to: Fentress. [20-1535] AW [Entered: 05/08/2020 09:46 AM]
May 8, 2020 Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00050-BO. Date notice of appeal filed: 05/07/2020. Case manager: AWalker. [20-1535] AW [Entered: 05/08/2020 09:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Angelic Hofler v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANGELIC BOULERICE HOFLER
Represented By: John Osborne Goss Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Amanda Burrell Gilman
Represented By: David Nathaniel Mervis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?