Johnna Lewis-Morse v. Andrew Saul
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHNNA LAURAINE LEWIS-MORSE
Case Number: 20-1539
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2020 Filing 11 COURT ORDER filed granting motion for abeyance [ # 10 ] Case 20-1539 placed in abeyance pending decision in 19-1529 and 19-1531 from Current appellate court. Copies to all parties. [1000753804] [20-1539] RHS [Entered: 06/09/2020 01:26 PM]
May 27, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION by Andrew Saul to place case in abeyance.. Date and method of service: 05/27/2020 ecf. [1000746725] [20-1539] Daniel Aguilar [Entered: 05/27/2020 09:17 PM]
May 22, 2020 Filing 9 BRIEFING ORDER filed.. FILING OF PAPER COPIES OF BRIEFS/APPENDICES IS SUSPENDED PENDING FURTHER NOTICE FROM THE COURT. Opening Brief and Appendix due 07/01/2020. Response Brief due 07/31/2020 [20-1539] RHS [Entered: 05/22/2020 09:17 AM]
May 22, 2020 Filing 8 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD in electronic format by Andrew Saul. Method of service: ECF service on counsel. [20-1539] David Mervis [Entered: 05/22/2020 06:50 AM]
May 21, 2020 Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD requested (counseled cases) . Was administrative record filed in electronic form in district court? Yes Administrative Record (Social Security) due 06/04/2020. [20-1539] RHS [Entered: 05/21/2020 12:56 PM]
May 21, 2020 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Johnna Lauraine Lewis-Morse. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000743327] [20-1539] John Goss [Entered: 05/21/2020 12:22 PM]
May 21, 2020 Filing 5 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Andrew Saul. [20-1539] Daniel Aguilar [Entered: 05/21/2020 11:29 AM]
May 21, 2020 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by John O. Goss for Johnna Lauraine Lewis-Morse. [1000743193] [20-1539] John Goss [Entered: 05/21/2020 10:46 AM]
May 20, 2020 Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Daniel Aguilar for Andrew Saul. [1000742332] [20-1539] Daniel Aguilar [Entered: 05/20/2020 11:07 AM]
May 20, 2020 Filing 2 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David N. Mervis for Andrew Saul. [1000741976] [20-1539] David Mervis [Entered: 05/20/2020 06:01 AM]
May 8, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1000735883-2 ] social security case Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00048-D.. [20-1539] RHS [Entered: 05/08/2020 10:39 AM]
May 8, 2020 Social Security case docketed. Originating case number: 2:18-cv-00048-D. Date notice of appeal filed: 05/07/2020. Case manager: RSewell. [20-1539] RHS [Entered: 05/08/2020 10:37 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Johnna Lewis-Morse v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lisa M. Rayo
Represented By: David Nathaniel Mervis
Represented By: Daniel Aguilar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JOHNNA LAURAINE LEWIS-MORSE
Represented By: Joseph Russell Fentress IV
Represented By: John Osborne Goss Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?