Shaoming Song v. Alex Azar
MICHAEL EVANS, Deputy Director of National Institute on Aging, MICHAEL BERNIER, Staff Scientist and ALEX AZAR |
SHAOMING SONG |
20-1554 |
May 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Shaoming Song re: failure to satisfy fee requirements. Mailed to: Shaoming Song 101 Roebuck Drive Toronto, Ontario, M1K 2H7 Canada. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 06/15/2020 12:51 PM] |
Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Shaoming Song. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 06/08/2020 01:57 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-01501-GLR. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 05/14/2020 08:27 AM] |
Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Shaoming Song 101 Roebuck Drive Toronto, Ontario, M1K 2H7 Canada. Informal Opening Brief due 06/08/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 05/13/2020 11:01 AM] |
Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Shaoming Song - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/12/2020. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-01501-GLR. Mailed to: Shaoming Song 101 Roebuck Drive Toronto, Ontario, M1K 2H7 Canada. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 05/13/2020 10:59 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 05/27/2020. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 05/13/2020 10:57 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-01501-GLR. Case manager: ABrownlee. [20-1554] AB [Entered: 05/13/2020 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.