In Re: Frank Marfo
| In re: FRANK MARFO |
| 20-157 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jason D. Medinger for US. [1000691433] [20-157] Jason Medinger [Entered: 02/26/2020 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [1] 2244 case. Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3. Mailed to: F. Marfo. [20-157] CT [Entered: 02/26/2020 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 SEALED district court document (court access only). Description of document: PSR. Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3. [20-157] CT [Entered: 02/26/2020 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3. Case manager: CathyHerb. [20-157] CT [Entered: 02/26/2020 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Frank Marfo. Is PSR available on district court docket? N. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? Y. [20-157] CT [Entered: 02/26/2020 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Frank Marfo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: FRANK MARFO | |
| Represented By: | Frank Marfo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
