In re: Kareem Currence
In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE |
20-1587 |
May 27, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Docket correction requested from Kareem Jamal Currence. Mailed to: K Currence. [20-1587] AW [Entered: 05/27/2020 08:52 AM] |
Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00231-MHL-1. Mailed to: K Currence. [20-1587] AW [Entered: 05/27/2020 08:50 AM] |
Filing 4 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [3] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: K Currence. [1000745934] [20-1587] AW [Entered: 05/27/2020 08:48 AM] |
Filing 3 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Kareem Jamal Currence. [20-1587] AW [Entered: 05/27/2020 08:47 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00231-MHL-1. Case manager: AWalker. [20-1587] AW [Entered: 05/27/2020 08:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Kareem Jamal Currence. [20-1587] AW [Entered: 05/27/2020 08:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Kareem Currence | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE | |
Represented By: | Kareem Jamal Currence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.