Naun Cruz-Velasquez v. William Barr
| A.E.C., ANA MARIA NAVARRO-GONZALEZ, J.O.C. and NAUN OTTONIEL CRUZ-VELASQUEZ |
| WILLIAM P. BARR |
| 20-1598 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Robbin Blaya for William P. Barr. [1000747255] [20-1598] Robbin Blaya [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from William P. Barr. Date petition for review or application filed: 05/27/2020. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Washington Field Office, 2675 Prosperity Avenue, 3rd Floor, Fairfax, VA 20598-5216. Administrative Record due 07/07/2020. [20-1598] CH [Entered: 05/28/2020 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A209-859-236, A209-859-237, A209-979-231, A209-979-232. [20-1598] CH [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:49 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A209-859-236, A209-859-237, A209-979-231, A209-979-232. Case manager: CHalupa. [20-1598] CH [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by A.E.C., Naun Ottoniel Cruz-Velasquez, J.O.C. and Ana Maria Navarro-Gonzalez. [1000747176] [20-1598] CH [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $500.00. Receipt Number: A04-69149-656. [20-1598] CH [Entered: 05/28/2020 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
