Shanell Royal v. Jane Kirschling
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANELL ROYAL and SHANELL Y. ROYAL
Defendant / Appellee: JANE KIRSCHLING, in her official capacity as Dean and Professor at the University of Maryland School of Nursing
Case Number: 20-1610
Filed: May 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2021 Shanell Royal v. Jane Kirschling

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2020 Filing 20 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Jane Kirschling. [20-1610] Constantine Hortis [Entered: 07/20/2020 03:59 PM]
July 20, 2020 Filing 19 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jane Kirschling. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000777979] [20-1610] Constantine Hortis [Entered: 07/20/2020 03:58 PM]
July 10, 2020 Filing 18 RESPONSE/ANSWER by to Motion to extend filing time [ # 16 ]. [20-1610] Shanell Royal [Entered: 07/10/2020 01:26 PM]
July 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 16 ] Number of days granted: 7., extending informal briefing order deadlines. Any Informal Response Brief due 07/20/2020. Copies to all parties.. [1000772564] [20-1610] JH [Entered: 07/10/2020 11:02 AM]
July 9, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION by Jane Kirschling to extend filing time for informal response brief until July 20, 2020.. Date and method of service: 07/09/2020 ecf. [1000772238] [20-1610] Constantine Hortis [Entered: 07/09/2020 05:20 PM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 15 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Constantine A Hortis for Jane Kirschling. [1000769809] [20-1610] Constantine Hortis [Entered: 07/06/2020 07:55 PM]
July 6, 2020 Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Shanell Y. Royal. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000769468] [20-1610] Shanell Royal [Entered: 07/06/2020 03:05 PM]
June 30, 2020 Filing 13 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Jane Kirschling re: filing of appearance form. Appearance form due on 07/06/2020 from Constantine Alexander Hortis. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 06/30/2020 11:00 AM]
June 30, 2020 Filing 12 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Shanell Y. Royal re: filing of disclosure form. Disclosure statement due from Shanell Y. Royal on 07/06/2020. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 06/30/2020 10:56 AM]
June 26, 2020 Filing 11 RESPONSE/ANSWER by to Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ]. [20-1610] Shanell Royal [Entered: 06/26/2020 09:16 AM]
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ] Number of days granted: 7. Any Informal Response Brief due 07/13/2020. Copies to all parties. [1000764558] [20-1610] DL [Entered: 06/26/2020 07:43 AM]
June 25, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION by Jane Kirschling to extend filing time for response brief until July 13, 2020.. Date and method of service: 06/25/2020 ecf. [1000764462] [20-1610] Constantine Hortis [Entered: 06/25/2020 05:31 PM]
June 25, 2020 Filing 8 Docket correction requested from Jane Kirschling. Re: [ # 7 ] document. Access to document has been restricted to case participants. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 06/25/2020 05:19 PM]
June 25, 2020 Filing 7 DOCUMENT referencing [ # 3 ] briefing order by Jane Kirschling. [1000764429] [20-1610] Constantine Hortis [Entered: 06/25/2020 04:59 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Shanell Y. Royal. [20-1610] Shanell Royal [Entered: 06/22/2020 04:18 PM]
June 12, 2020 Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-02825-CCB. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 06/12/2020 10:55 AM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 06/12/2020. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:20 PM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Shanell Royal. Informal Opening Brief due 06/22/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:18 PM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Shanell Royal - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/29/2020 Originating case number: 1:19-cv-02825-CCB. Mailed to: Shanell Royal. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:16 PM]
May 29, 2020 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-02825-CCB. Case manager: KHancock. [20-1610] KH [Entered: 05/29/2020 04:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shanell Royal v. Jane Kirschling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SHANELL ROYAL
Represented By: Shanell Royal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SHANELL Y. ROYAL
Represented By: Shanell Y. Royal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE KIRSCHLING, in her official capacity as Dean and Professor at the University of Maryland School of Nursing
Represented By: Constantine Alexander Hortis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?