In re: Michael Rankins
| In re: MICHAEL RANKINS |
| 20-1625 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FEE NOTICE issued to Michael Rankins - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/18/2020. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00003-FL-1. Mailed to: Michael Rankins FCI TERRE HAUTE P. O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808. [20-1625] AB [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00003-FL-1. Mailed to: Michael Rankins FCI TERRE HAUTE P. O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808. [20-1625] AB [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:14-cr-00003-FL-1. Case manager: ABrownlee. [20-1625] AB [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Michael Rankins. [20-1625] AB [Entered: 06/03/2020 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Michael Rankins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL RANKINS | |
| Represented By: | Michael Rankins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
