Richard Boggs v. US
Defendant: PETER RAE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD E. BOGGS
Case Number: 20-1672
Filed: June 18, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 17, 2020 Richard Boggs v. US

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Filing 10 BRIEF by US in electronic and paper format. Type of Brief: RESPONSE. [1000787621] [20-1672] Robert Branman [Entered: 08/05/2020 11:56 AM]
August 5, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION by US to impose sanctions.. Date and method of service: 08/05/2020 ecf, US mail. [1000787599] [20-1672] Robert Branman [Entered: 08/05/2020 11:43 AM]
August 5, 2020 Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Arthur T. Catterall (co-counsel) for US. [1000787374] [20-1672] Arthur Catterall [Entered: 08/05/2020 09:36 AM]
July 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ] Number of days granted: 14., extending informal briefing order deadlines. Any Informal Response Brief due 08/05/2020. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Richard Boggs. [1000778677] [20-1672] JH [Entered: 07/21/2020 02:23 PM]
July 21, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION by US to extend filing time for response brief until August 5, 2020.. Date and method of service: 07/21/2020 ecf, US mail. [1000778644] [20-1672] Robert Branman [Entered: 07/21/2020 01:42 PM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Richard E. Boggs. [20-1672] JHM [Entered: 07/14/2020 04:09 PM]
June 25, 2020 Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Robert J. Branman for US. [1000764048] [20-1672] Robert Branman [Entered: 06/25/2020 11:54 AM]
June 18, 2020 Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00551-MGL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-1672] JHM [Entered: 06/18/2020 07:42 AM]
June 18, 2020 Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Richard E. Boggs. Informal Opening Brief due 07/13/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-1672] JHM [Entered: 06/18/2020 07:38 AM]
June 18, 2020 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:19-cv-00551-MGL. Case manager: JMoore. [20-1672] JHM [Entered: 06/18/2020 07:36 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Boggs v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: John Douglas Barnett
Represented By: Arthur Thomas Catterall
Represented By: Robert Joel Branman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD E. BOGGS
Represented By: Richard E. Boggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PETER RAE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?