Patricia Richard v. Elizabeth Tallant
ELIZABETH TALLANT and ELIZABETH S. TALLANT |
PATRICIA RICHARD |
20-1752 |
July 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Patricia Richard v. Elizabeth Tallant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion for abeyance filed by Appellant Ms. Elizabeth S. Tallant [ # 10 ]; granting Motion to extend filing time informal opening brief [ # 16 ] Number of days granted: 30., Informal Opening Brief due 10/02/2020 Copies to all parties.; Granting motion to extend filing time for reply, days granted 14 [1000804471] [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 09/02/2020 03:29 PM] |
Filing 17 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Patricia Richard to notice requesting response [ # 11 ]. [20-1752] Christina Clodfelter [Entered: 09/01/2020 06:24 PM] |
Filing 16 MOTION by Ms. Elizabeth S. Tallant to extend filing time for reply until Court's discretion.. Date and method of service: 09/01/2020 US mail. [1000803783] [20-1752] Elizabeth Tallant [Entered: 09/01/2020 05:20 PM] |
Filing 15 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL for Patricia Richard. [1000800864] [20-1752] Christina Clodfelter [Entered: 08/27/2020 03:02 PM] |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM REPLY BRIEF by Patricia Richard. [20-1752] Christina Clodfelter [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:34 PM] |
Filing 13 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Patricia Richard to Motion to appoint/assign counsel [ # 7 ]. [20-1752] Christina Clodfelter [Entered: 08/27/2020 01:30 PM] |
Filing 12 ORDER filed suspending informal briefing Copies to all parties.. [1000800706] [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 08/27/2020 11:52 AM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE ISSUED to Patricia Richard requesting response to Motion for abeyance [ # 10 ]Response due 09/08/2020..[1000800703]. [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 08/27/2020 11:46 AM] |
Filing 10 MOTION by Ms. Elizabeth S. Tallant to place case in abeyance. Date and method of service: 08/26/2020 US mail. [1000800650] [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 08/27/2020 11:01 AM] |
Filing 9 ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to file electronically [ # 8 ]. Copies to all parties. [1000798089] [20-1752] KS [Entered: 08/24/2020 02:54 PM] |
Filing 8 MOTION by Elizabeth Tallant for Electronic Filing. Date and method of service: 08/13/2020 US mail. [1000794420] [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:24 AM] |
Filing 7 MOTION by Elizabeth Tallant to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 08/13/2020 US mail. [1000794414] [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:21 AM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 5 ] Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 09/02/2020 Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Elizabeth Tallant. [1000783597] [20-1752] TW [Entered: 07/29/2020 09:47 AM] |
Filing 5 MOTION by Elizabeth Tallant to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 07/24/2020 US mail. [1000783591] [20-1752] TW [Entered: 07/29/2020 09:43 AM] |
Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00029-KDB-DCK. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 07/16/2020 03:28 PM] |
Filing 3 IFP APPLICATION transferred from district court (court access only). [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 07/16/2020 03:26 PM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 08/03/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 07/09/2020 01:27 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00029-KDB-DCK. Case manager: RSewell. [20-1752] RHS [Entered: 07/09/2020 01:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.