In re: David Hill
| In re: DAVID HILL |
| 20-1771 |
| July 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1. Mailed to: David Hill, Dabney Langhorne, Patrick Elwell. [20-1771] CH [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from David Hill re: petition for writ of mandamus. Mailed to: David Hill, Dabney Langhorne, Patrick Elwell. [20-1771] CH [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to David Hill - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 07/29/2020. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1. Mailed to: David Hill, Patrick Elwell, Dabney Langhorne. [20-1771] CH [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by David Hill. [20-1771] CH [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1. Case manager: CHalupa. [20-1771] CH [Entered: 07/14/2020 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: David Hill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DAVID HILL | |
| Represented By: | David Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
