In re: Anthony Andrews
In re: ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat |
20-1802 |
July 23, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Anthony Andrews and Lawrence Cameron. [1000780477] [20-1802] RE [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:45 PM] |
Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Anthony Andrews. [20-1802] RE [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:44 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 7:01-cr-00027-BO-1. Mailed to: Anthony Andrews and Lawrence Cameron. [20-1802] RE [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:42 PM] |
Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Anthony Andrews. [20-1802] RE [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:38 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:01-cr-00027-BO-1. Case manager: REdwards. [20-1802] RE [Entered: 07/23/2020 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Anthony Andrews | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat | |
Represented By: | Anthony Andrews |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.