Level at 401 LP v. First Co.
| LEVEL AT 401 LP |
| FIRST CO., EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and COPELAND CORPORATION, LLC |
| 20-1900 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00085-M. Mailed to: Mark Finkelstein. [20-1900] RJL [Entered: 09/03/2020 12:07 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal. [ # 4 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Mark Finkelstein. [1000804971] [20-1900] RJL [Entered: 09/03/2020 11:53 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION by Level at 401 LP to dismiss appeal [4]. Date and method of service: 09/03/2020 ecf. [1000804940] [20-1900] Michael Knapp [Entered: 09/03/2020 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Rabee El-Jaouhari and Mark Finkelstein. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 09/29/2020. Response Brief due 10/29/2020. [20-1900] RJL [Entered: 08/20/2020 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00085-M. Mailed to: Rabee El-Jaouhari and Mark FInkelstein. [20-1900] RJL [Entered: 08/20/2020 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-cv-00085-M. Case manager: Rachel Lee. [20-1900] RJL [Entered: 08/20/2020 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
