Despina Lucas v. US
JOHN JOSEPH MILAM, JOE PORTO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HOUR-MAN, INC., STATE OF ILINOIS, ALLIANT TECHNICAL and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
DESPINA NEUPH LUCAS |
20-1977 |
September 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter re: [ # 6 ] informal opening brief by Ms. Despina Neuph Lucas . [1000842246] [20-1977] Despina Lucas [Entered: 11/04/2020 02:22 PM] |
Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Ms. Despina Neuph Lucas. [20-1977] Despina Lucas [Entered: 10/14/2020 04:02 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 4 ] Number of days granted: 14. Informal Opening Brief due 10/22/2020 Copies to all parties. [1000822651] [20-1977] JHM [Entered: 10/02/2020 01:05 PM] |
Filing 4 MOTION by Ms. Despina Neuph Lucas to extend filing time for informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 10/02/2020 ecf. [1000822526] [20-1977]--[Party filer added 10/02/2020 by ALC] Despina Lucas [Entered: 10/02/2020 11:57 AM] |
Filing 3 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 2:20-cv-00409-AWA-LRL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-1977] JHM [Entered: 09/30/2020 03:34 PM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Despina Lucas. Informal Opening Brief due 10/08/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-1977] JHM [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:01 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:20-cv-00409-AWA-LRL. Case manager: JMoore. [20-1977] JHM [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.