Carla Lewis v. J. T. Fanning
WELLS FARGO, N. A. and J. T. FANNING, Divisional Manager, M.D. |
CARLA T. LEWIS |
20-2057 |
October 4, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wells Fargo, N. A.. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1000850862] [20-2057] John Lynch [Entered: 11/18/2020 05:46 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by John C. Lynch for Wells Fargo, N. A.. [1000850859] [20-2057] John Lynch [Entered: 11/18/2020 05:42 PM] |
Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Carla T. Lewis. [20-2057] AB [Entered: 10/30/2020 02:06 PM] |
Filing 5 Notice issued re: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis deemed moot. Mailed to: Carla T. Lewis 259 Union Mill Road Farnham, VA 22460. [20-2057] AB [Entered: 10/14/2020 10:29 AM] |
Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Carla T. Lewis. [20-2057] AB [Entered: 10/14/2020 10:28 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Carla T. Lewis 259 Union Mill Road Farnham, VA 22460. Informal Opening Brief due 10/29/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-2057] AB [Entered: 10/05/2020 07:07 AM] |
Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 3:20-cv-00589-DJN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-2057] AB [Entered: 10/04/2020 11:04 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:20-cv-00589-DJN. Case manager: ABrownlee. [20-2057] AB [Entered: 10/04/2020 11:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.