Carlos Chacon v. William Barr
| CARLOS FRANCISCO CHACON |
| JORGE L. MONTESINO, Assistant Chief and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 20-2074 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rosanne M. Perry for William P. Barr. [1000826341] [20-2074] Rosanne Perry [Entered: 10/08/2020 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Carlos Chacon. Informal Opening Brief due 11/02/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-2074] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 FEE NOTICE issued to Carlos Francisco Chacon - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 10/23/2020. Originating case number: A216-641-044. Mailed to: Carlos Chacon. [20-2074] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from William P. Barr. Date petition for review or application filed: 10/07/2020. [ # 1 ] petition for review. Mailed to: Jorge L. Montesinos 1901 South Bell Street, Suite 900 Arlington, VA 22202. Administrative Record due 11/17/2020 [20-2074] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:21 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A216-641-044. Case manager: REdwards. [20-2074] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for review of agency order filed by Carlos Francisco Chacon .[1000826139] [20-2074] RE [Entered: 10/08/2020 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
