Riccy Funez-Munguia v. William Barr
| A.I.F and RICCY MABEL FUNEZ-MUNGUIA |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 20-2124 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Riccy Funez-Munguia v. Merrick Garland |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record from William P. Barr. Date petition for review or application filed: 10/20/2020. [ # 2 ] petition for review. Mailed to: David M. McConnell, Director Office of Immigration Litigation US DOJ/Civil Division 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 and Felicia S. Skinner Field Office Director US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Atlanta Field Office 180 Spring Street SW Suite 522 Atlanta, GA 30303. Administrative Record due 11/30/2020 [20-2124] RE [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A208-979-504, A208-979-503. [20-2124] RE [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by A.I.F and Riccy Mabel Funez-Munguia .[1000832477] [20-2124] RE [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee:$500.00 Receipt Number:A04-69741-157. [20-2124] RE [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:13 AM] |
| Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A208-979-504,A208-979-503. Case manager: REdwards. [20-2124] RE [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
