The Redeemed Christian Church v. Prince George's County, MD
| PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND |
| THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD (VICTORY TEMPLE) BOWIE, MARYLAND |
| 20-2125 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Redeemed Christian Church of God v. Prince George's County
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ward B. Coe III for The Redeemed Christian Church of God (Victory Temple) Bowie, Maryland. [1000842459] [20-2125] Ward Coe [Entered: 11/04/2020 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Joseph C. Dugan for The Redeemed Christian Church of God (Victory Temple) Bowie, Maryland. [1000841670] [20-2125] Ward Coe [Entered: 11/03/2020 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Redeemed Christian Church of God (Victory Temple) Bowie, Maryland. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000841630] [20-2125] Ward Coe [Entered: 11/03/2020 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ashley N. Fellona for Prince George's County, Maryland. [1000841553] [20-2125] Ashley Fellona [Entered: 11/03/2020 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed for Prince George County, Maryland. Identify by proceeding and date all transcript ordered from this court reporter: Zoom Trial 06/23/20, 06/24/20 & 06/25/20. Names of all parties ordering transcript from this reporter: Prince George County, Maryland. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-03367-DKC. Transcript due from Cindy Davis, Official Court Reporter on 01/11/2021. [20-2125] TW [Entered: 11/03/2020 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Prince George's County, Maryland. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000841330] [20-2125] Donald Rea [Entered: 11/03/2020 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Prince George's County, Maryland. [20-2125] Donald Rea [Entered: 11/03/2020 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Donald A. Rea. Esq. for Prince George's County, Maryland. [1000840752] [20-2125] Donald Rea [Entered: 11/02/2020 06:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case Originating case number: 8:19-cv-03367-DKC.. [20-2125] MR [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-03367-DKC. Case manager: MRadday. [20-2125] MR [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: The Redeemed Christian Church v. Prince George's County, MD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND | |
| Represented By: | Donald A. Rea |
| Represented By: | Ashley N. Fellona |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: THE REDEEMED CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF GOD (VICTORY TEMPLE) BOWIE, MARYLAND | |
| Represented By: | Ward Baldwin Coe Esq. III |
| Represented By: | Joseph Christian Dugan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
