In re: Steve Riddick
| In re: STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick |
| 20-2228 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Steve Riddick ]. Fee due to Court of Appeals or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Riddick. [20-2228] TF [Entered: 11/18/2020 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 Docket correction requested from Steve Riddick. Mailed to: Riddick. [20-2228] TF [Entered: 11/18/2020 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00081-GEC-PMS. Mailed to: Riddick. [20-2228] TF [Entered: 11/18/2020 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:20-cv-00081-GEC-PMS. Case manager: TFischer. [20-2228] TF [Entered: 11/18/2020 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Steve Riddick. [20-2228] TF [Entered: 11/18/2020 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Steve Riddick | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick | |
| Represented By: | Steve Riddick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
