Jerome Brown v. Fernando Galindo
| CLERK FERNANDO GALINDO, Eastern District of Virginia, IVAN DARNELL DAVIS, Magistrate Judge, JOHN TUCKER FARNUM, Miles and Stockbridge Deceased Attorneys and JAMES IRVING, Registered Agent for Southern Management |
| JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR. |
| 20-2264 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Jerome Brown. [20-2264] KH [Entered: 01/06/2021 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-01329-LMB-MSN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-2264] KH [Entered: 12/01/2020 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 12/09/2020. [20-2264] KH [Entered: 11/25/2020 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Jerome Brown. Informal Opening Brief due 12/21/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-2264] KH [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 12/28/2020. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-01329-LMB-MSN. Mailed to: Jerome Brown. [20-2264] KH [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:20-cv-01329-LMB-MSN. Case manager: KHancock. [20-2264] KH [Entered: 11/25/2020 01:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
