Stacy Moore v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
| LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC. |
| STACY MOORE |
| 20-2346 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Stacy Moore v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [8] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Stacy Moore. [1000885626] [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 01/22/2021 10:50 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 9 ] Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 02/22/2021 Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Stacy Moore. [1000885623] [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 01/22/2021 10:45 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION by Stacy Moore to extend filing time for informal opening brief.. Date and method of service: 01/19/2021 US mail. [1000885177] [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 01/21/2021 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 8 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Stacy Moore. [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 01/21/2021 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Stacy Moore re: failure to satisfy fee and informal briefing requirements Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Stacy Moore. [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 01/19/2021 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Lumber Liquidators, Inc.. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? Yes [1000873283] [20-2346] Michael Lacy [Entered: 12/30/2020 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Michael E. Lacy for Lumber Liquidators, Inc.. [1000873274] [20-2346] Michael Lacy [Entered: 12/30/2020 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-02823-AJT-MSN,1:15-md-02627-AJT-MSN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 12/17/2020 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Stacy Moore. Informal Opening Brief due 01/11/2021 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 12/17/2020 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Stacy Moore - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 01/19/2021 Originating case number: 1:19-cv-02823-AJT-MSN,1:15-md-02627-AJT-MSN. Mailed to: Stacy Moore. [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 12/17/2020 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-02823-AJT-MSN,1:15-md-02627-AJT-MSN. Case manager: JMoore. [20-2346] JHM [Entered: 12/17/2020 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stacy Moore v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Amy M. Power |
| Represented By: | Halli Dee Cohn |
| Represented By: | Michael Edward Lacy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: STACY MOORE | |
| Represented By: | Stacy Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
