Thomas Cannon v. Calvin R. Peck, Jr.
| NICHOLAS M. TERRELL, JESSE M. CONNER, THOMAS M. CANNON and DONALD M. KOONS |
| CALVIN R. PECK, JR., in his individual capacity, VILLAGE OF BALD HEAD ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA and CAROLINE MITCHELL, in her individual capacity |
| 20-2382 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Thomas Cannon v. Calvin R. Peck, Jr.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to amend/correct filed by Cross-Appellees Thomas M. Cannon, Jesse M. Conner, Donald M. Koons and Nicholas M. Terrell [ # 19 ] Copies to all parties. [1000904434] [20-2382, 21-1061] AW [Entered: 02/23/2021 04:44 PM]
|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Caroline Mitchell and Calvin R. Peck, Jr. in 20-2382, Caroline Mitchell, Calvin R. Peck, Jr. and Village of Bald Head Island, North Carolina in 21-1061 to Motion to amend/correct [ # 19 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [20-2382, 21-1061] Norwood Blanchard [Entered: 02/22/2021 11:57 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE ISSUED to Caroline Mitchell and Calvin R. Peck, Jr. in 20-2382 , 21-1061 requesting response to Motion to amend/correct [ # 19 ] Response due 02/22/2021. [1000897523]. [20-2382, 21-1061] KH [Entered: 02/10/2021 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION by Thomas M. Cannon, Jesse M. Conner, Donald M. Koons and Nicholas M. Terrell in 20-2382, 21-1061 to amend/correct. Date and method of service: 02/10/2021 ecf. [1000897500] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 02/10/2021 04:11 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER filed extending cross-appeal briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 03/19/2021. Opening/Response Brief Due: 04/19/2021. Response/Reply Brief Due 05/24/2021. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Copies to all parties. [1000897424] [20-2382, 21-1061] KH [Entered: 02/10/2021 03:42 PM]
|
| Filing 17 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Name of Cross-Appeal Appellant for briefing purposes: Calvin R. Peck, Jr.; Caroline Mitchell. Paper copy requirements are temporarily suspended unless the case is under pre-argument review or being scheduled for argument, in which case a total of four paper copies of formal briefs and appendices are required. Opening Brief and Appendix due 03/02/2021. Opening/Response Brief Due: 04/01/2021. Response/Reply Brief Due 05/03/2021. [20-2382, 21-1061] KH [Entered: 01/21/2021 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 16 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Thomas M. Cannon, Jesse M. Conner, Donald M. Koons and Nicholas M. Terrell. [21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/20/2021 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE ISSUED re: Amended case caption. [20-2382] KH [Entered: 01/19/2021 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 14 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Nicholas M. Terrell in 20-2382, 21-1061. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000882262] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Donald M. Koons in 20-2382, 21-1061. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000882261] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jesse M. Conner in 20-2382, 21-1061. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000882260] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Thomas M. Cannon in 20-2382, 21-1061. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000882257] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/15/2021 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 10 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [20-2382, 21-1061] LHP [Entered: 01/14/2021 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Calvin R. Peck, Jr. in 20-2382, 21-1061. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000881012] [20-2382, 21-1061] Norwood Blanchard [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Caroline Mitchell in 20-2382, 21-1061. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000881011] [20-2382, 21-1061] Norwood Blanchard [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Caroline Mitchell and Calvin R. Peck, Jr.. [20-2382] Norwood Blanchard [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Norwood P. Blanchard III for Caroline Mitchell and Calvin R. Peck, Jr. in 20-2382, 21-1061. [1000881008] [20-2382, 21-1061] Norwood Blanchard [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Samuel B. Potter for Thomas M. Cannon, Jesse M. Conner, Donald M. Koons and Nicholas M. Terrell in 20-2382, 21-1061. [1000880995] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Bradley A. Coxe for Thomas M. Cannon, Jesse M. Conner, Donald M. Koons and Nicholas M. Terrell in 20-2382, 21-1061. [1000880994] [20-2382, 21-1061] Bradley Coxe [Entered: 01/13/2021 04:27 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER filed consolidating case 21-1061 with 20-2382. Cross-appeal appellant: Village of Bald Head Island, North Carolina; Calvin R. Peck, Jr.; Caroline Mitchell. Copies to all parties. [1000880869] [20-2382, 21-1061] KH [Entered: 01/13/2021 03:04 PM]
|
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00187-H-KS. [20-2382] KH [Entered: 12/30/2020 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00187-H-KS. Case manager: KHancock. [20-2382] KH [Entered: 12/30/2020 03:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
