In re: Steven Stanley
| In re: STEVEN LAMONTE STANLEY, a/k/a Azar, a/k/a Doc |
| 20-369 |
| June 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [1] 2244 case. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00344-HCM-1. Mailed to: Steven Stanley. [20-369] RE [Entered: 06/30/2020 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 PARTIAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/06/2020 [20-369] RE [Entered: 06/30/2020 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00344-HCM-1. Case manager: REdwards. [20-369] RE [Entered: 06/30/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Steven Lamonte Stanley. Is PSR available on district court docket? Y. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? Y. [20-369] RE [Entered: 06/30/2020 12:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Steven Stanley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: STEVEN LAMONTE STANLEY, a/k/a Azar, a/k/a Doc | |
| Represented By: | Steven Lamonte Stanley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
