In Re: Rodney Smith
Petitioner: In re: RODNEY EUGENE SMITH
Case Number: 20-434
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Filing 4 PARTIAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 09/11/2020 [20-434] CT [Entered: 09/08/2020 11:06 AM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [1] 2244 case. Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00114-HEH-DJN-1. Mailed to: Rodney Smith. [20-434] CT [Entered: 09/08/2020 11:04 AM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00114-HEH-DJN-1. Case manager: CathyHerb. [20-434] CT [Entered: 09/08/2020 09:31 AM]
September 4, 2020 Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Rodney Eugene Smith. Is PSR available on district court docket? Y. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? N. [20-434] CT [Entered: 09/08/2020 11:03 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In Re: Rodney Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: RODNEY EUGENE SMITH
Represented By: Rodney Eugene Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?