In re: Richard Curry
| In re: RICHARD LEE CURRY |
| 20-459 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)). Mailed to: Richard Lee Curry RED ONION STATE PRISON 10800 H. Jack Rose Highway P. O. Box 970 Pound, VA 24279-0000 and Mark Rankin Herring. [20-459] AB [Entered: 10/07/2020 06:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Case manager: ABrownlee. [20-459] AB [Entered: 10/07/2020 06:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Richard Lee Curry. [20-459] AB [Entered: 10/07/2020 06:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Richard Lee Curry. Is PSR available on district court docket? NA. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? NA. [20-459] AB [Entered: 10/07/2020 06:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Richard Curry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RICHARD LEE CURRY | |
| Represented By: | Richard Lee Curry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
