James Cooper v. John Doe
| JAMES COOPER |
| JOHN DOE and KENNETH E. LASSITER |
| 20-6042 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03099-FL. Mailed to: James Cooper. [20-6042] CB [Entered: 03/06/2020 04:03 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: James Cooper. [1000697558] [20-6042] CB [Entered: 03/06/2020 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to James Cooper re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: James Cooper. [20-6042] CB [Entered: 02/11/2020 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 PLRA NOTICE issued to James Cooper. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: James Cooper. [20-6042] CB [Entered: 01/08/2020 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: James Cooper. Informal Opening Brief due 02/03/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-6042] CB [Entered: 01/08/2020 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03099-FL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6042] CB [Entered: 01/08/2020 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03099-FL. Case manager: CBennett. [20-6042] CB [Entered: 01/08/2020 08:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
