Christopher Gay v. Chip Shuler
| CHRISTOPHER DANIEL GAY |
| MR. CHIP SHULER and MR. DAVID P. HELMS |
| 20-6134 |
| January 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [20-6134] TW [Entered: 02/28/2020 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Christopher Daniel Gay to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6]. Date and method of service: 02/06/2020 US mail. [1000682876] [20-6134] CT [Entered: 02/13/2020 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Christopher Daniel Gay to return money seized. Date and method of service: 02/07/2020 US mail. [1000682259] [20-6134] CT [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00439-JPJ-PMS. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6134] CT [Entered: 01/29/2020 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: C. Gay. Informal Opening Brief due 02/24/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-6134] CT [Entered: 01/29/2020 10:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Christopher Daniel Gay ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: C. Gay. [20-6134] CT [Entered: 01/29/2020 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:19-cv-00439-JPJ-PMS. Case manager: CathyHerb. [20-6134] CT [Entered: 01/29/2020 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
