Momolu Sirleaf v. Scott Harris
SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States ("Scotus"), LYNDA BURROWS, Mailroom Clerk, BARBARA MIKELJOHN, Clerk, Circuit Court of Montgomery County, JOHN DOES 1-7 and JORDAN, Judge, Circuit Court of Montgomery County |
PRIEST MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, Pharaoh & Priest and COMMONWEALTH OF ISRAEL |
20-6213 |
February 13, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Momolu V.S. Sirleaf re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf. [20-6213] JR [Entered: 03/05/2020 12:14 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf. [1000696408] [20-6213] JR [Entered: 03/05/2020 12:05 PM] |
Filing 4 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Momolu V.S. Sirleaf. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [20-6213] JR [Entered: 03/04/2020 03:13 PM] |
Filing 3 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Momolu V.S. Sirleaf re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf. [20-6213] JR [Entered: 03/02/2020 04:20 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Momolu V.S. Sirleaf ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf. [20-6213] JR [Entered: 02/13/2020 08:41 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-02380-TDC. Case manager: JRice. [20-6213] JR [Entered: 02/13/2020 08:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.