Alex King v. Medical Staff
| NURSE ALLISON, LT. RONALD GORE, NURSE MELISSA, CAPTAIN JEAN EVANS, OFFICER FRANCISCO and MEDICAL STAFF, Brunswick County Jail |
| ALEX OHARA KING |
| 20-6251 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [6] Fee Amount: $505. Name and Prisoner Number: Alex Ohara King, #70006-056. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: A. King. [1000705170] [20-6251] CT [Entered: 03/19/2020 09:52 AM]
|
| Filing 6 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Alex Ohara King. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [20-6251] CT [Entered: 03/17/2020 05:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Alex Ohara King. [20-6251] CT [Entered: 03/17/2020 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 03/16/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-6251] CT [Entered: 02/21/2020 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Alex Ohara King ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [20-6251] CT [Entered: 02/21/2020 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03112-FL. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6251] CT [Entered: 02/21/2020 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:19-ct-03112-FL. Case manager: CathyHerb. [20-6251] CT [Entered: 02/21/2020 11:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
