Daniel McRae v. Timothy Stewart
DANIEL MCRAE |
RN PAMELA MCCORMICK, HSA J. HAMILTON-RUMER and TIMOTHY S. STEWART |
20-6749 |
May 20, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-00057-PJM. Mailed to: Daniel McRae. [20-6749] RE [Entered: 06/12/2020 03:49 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 6 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Daniel McRae. [1000756479] [20-6749] RE [Entered: 06/12/2020 03:47 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION by Daniel McRae to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6]. [1000756477] [20-6749] RE [Entered: 06/12/2020 03:46 PM] |
Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-00057-PJM. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6749] RE [Entered: 05/29/2020 09:48 AM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 06/03/2020. [20-6749] RE [Entered: 05/20/2020 02:50 PM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Daniel McRae. Informal Opening Brief due 06/15/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-6749] RE [Entered: 05/20/2020 02:48 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Daniel McRae ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Daniel McRae. [20-6749] RE [Entered: 05/20/2020 02:46 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-00057-PJM. Case manager: REdwards. [20-6749] RE [Entered: 05/20/2020 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.