David Smith v. State of North Carolina
| STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and BRYAN WELLS |
| DAVID LEE SMITH |
| 20-6797 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03196-D. Mailed to: David Smith. [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 07/24/2020 12:15 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Smith. [1000781060] [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 07/24/2020 12:14 PM]
|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Lee Smith re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 06/29/2020 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 5 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [3] Copies to all parties..[1000765588] [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 06/29/2020 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION by David Lee Smith for injunctive relief pending appeal. Date and method of service: 06/10/2020 US mail. [1000757725] [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 06/16/2020 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by David Lee Smith. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 06/12/2020 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ David Lee Smith ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 06/01/2020 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03196-D. Case manager: RSewell. [20-6797] RHS [Entered: 06/01/2020 08:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
