Farid Mangal v. Warden Perry Correctional Inst
Petitioner / Appellant: FARID AHMAD MANGAL, a/k/a Farid Ahmad Maugal
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Case Number: 20-6810
Filed: June 3, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2020 Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES by Farid Ahmad Mangal. [1000775586]. [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 07/15/2020 02:50 PM]
June 29, 2020 Filing 11 Corrected APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Derek J. Enderlin for Farid Ahmad Mangal. [1000765839] [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 06/29/2020 03:40 PM]
June 29, 2020 Filing 10 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Farid Ahmad Mangal. [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 06/29/2020 03:31 PM]
June 29, 2020 Filing 9 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Derek J. Enderlin for Farid Ahmad Mangal. --[Edited 06/29/2020 by RE-See ECF No. 11] [1000765823] [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 06/29/2020 03:28 PM]
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Farid Ahmad Mangal [ # 7 ] Until:. Copies to all parties. [1000759330] [20-6810] RE [Entered: 06/18/2020 06:47 AM]
June 15, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION by Farid Ahmad Mangal to appoint/assign counsel.. Date and method of service: 06/15/2020 ecf. [1000757068] [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 06/15/2020 12:32 PM]
June 15, 2020 Filing 6 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 6:18-cv-00106-RBH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case? No [20-6810] RE [Entered: 06/15/2020 07:07 AM]
June 11, 2020 Filing 5 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 07/06/2020. [20-6810] RE [Entered: 06/11/2020 11:12 AM]
June 10, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION by Farid Ahmad Mangal for certificate of appealability. Date and method of service: 06/10/2020 ecf. [1000754928] [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 06/10/2020 04:24 PM]
June 10, 2020 Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court Due: 06/24/2020. [20-6810] RE [Entered: 06/10/2020 04:16 PM]
June 10, 2020 Filing 2 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) DOCUMENT referencing [ # 1 ] habeas case - Request for Certificate of Appealability by Farid Ahmad Mangal.--[Edited 06/11/2020 by RE-See ECF No. 4 for correct event] [1000754852] [20-6810] Derek Enderlin [Entered: 06/10/2020 03:37 PM]
June 3, 2020 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 6:18-cv-00106-RBH. Date notice of appeal filed: 06/02/2020. Case manager: REdwards. Did district court rule on COA? No. [20-6810] RE [Entered: 06/03/2020 09:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Farid Mangal v. Warden Perry Correctional Inst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: FARID AHMAD MANGAL, a/k/a Farid Ahmad Maugal
Represented By: Derek Joseph Enderlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: WARDEN, PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Represented By: William Edgar Salter III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?