Daniel Thomas v. Officer Boone
Defendant: OFFICER TORRES
Defendant / Appellee: OFFICER TYSON and OFFICER BOONE
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL ISAIAH THOMAS
Case Number: 20-6817
Filed: June 5, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2020 Filing 9 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03100-BO. Mailed to: Daniel Thomas. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 07/27/2020 12:16 PM]
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 7 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Daniel Thomas. [1000781913] [20-6817] CB [Entered: 07/27/2020 12:13 PM]
July 27, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION by Daniel Isaiah Thomas to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [7]. Date and method of service: 07/13/2020 US mail. [1000781911] [20-6817] CB [Entered: 07/27/2020 12:12 PM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Daniel Isaiah Thomas. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 07/14/2020 12:06 PM]
July 7, 2020 Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Daniel Isaiah Thomas re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Daniel Thomas. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 07/07/2020 11:01 AM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 4 PLRA NOTICE issued to Daniel Isaiah Thomas. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Daniel Thomas. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 06/05/2020 09:45 AM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Daniel Thomas. Informal Opening Brief due 06/29/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 06/05/2020 09:41 AM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03100-BO. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 06/05/2020 09:40 AM]
June 5, 2020 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:18-ct-03100-BO. Case manager: CBennett. [20-6817] CB [Entered: 06/05/2020 09:34 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Thomas v. Officer Boone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OFFICER TYSON
Represented By: Orlando Luis Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OFFICER BOONE
Represented By: Orlando Luis Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DANIEL ISAIAH THOMAS
Represented By: Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER TORRES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?