John Baccus v. SC Dept of Corrections
| SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt |
| 20-6871 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| John Baccus v. SC Dept of Corrections |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Letter requesting copies by John Roosevelt Baccus . [1000783903] [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/29/2020 03:26 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [5] Fee Amount: $505.00. Name and Prisoner Number: John Baccus, #187393. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Baccus; warden. [1000772162] [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/09/2020 04:09 PM]
|
| Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by John Roosevelt Baccus. [20-6871] TW [Entered: 07/09/2020 03:05 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ] Number of days granted: 20. Informal Opening Brief due 07/27/2020. Copies to all parties.. [1000771332] [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/08/2020 03:34 PM]
|
| Filing 7 PLRA/IFP-TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT (court access only) by John Roosevelt Baccus. [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/08/2020 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION by John Roosevelt Baccus to extend filing time for informal opening brief by 20 days. Date and method of service: 06/26/2020 US mail. [1000771317] [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/08/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by John Roosevelt Baccus. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/01/2020 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 Supplemental INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by John Roosevelt Baccus (self titled - motion for vacate and remand hearing) . [20-6871] CT [Entered: 07/10/2020 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: J. Baccus. Informal Opening Brief due 07/06/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-6871] CT [Entered: 06/12/2020 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ John Roosevelt Baccus ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: J. Baccus. [20-6871] CT [Entered: 06/12/2020 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 9:19-cv-00284-DCN. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6871] CT [Entered: 06/12/2020 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 9:19-cv-00284-DCN. Case manager: CathyHerb. [20-6871] CT [Entered: 06/12/2020 11:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Baccus v. SC Dept of Corrections | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt | |
| Represented By: | John Roosevelt Baccus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
