Ricardo Fishbourne v. FBI
| SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
| RICARDO FISHBOURNE, a/k/a Ricardo Fishburne |
| 20-6897 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Ricardo Fishbourne re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Ricardo Fishbourne. [20-6897] JSN [Entered: 07/20/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-01480-TMC. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-6897] JSN [Entered: 07/08/2020 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/01/2020. [20-6897] JSN [Entered: 06/17/2020 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Informal Opening Brief due 07/13/2020. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. Mailed to: Ricardo Fishourne. [20-6897] JSN [Entered: 06/17/2020 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Ricardo Fishbourne ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Ricardo Fishourne. [20-6897] JSN [Entered: 06/17/2020 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-01480-TMC. Case manager: JeffNeal. [20-6897] JSN [Entered: 06/17/2020 10:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
