Kenneth Hinton v. Paul DeWolfe
| JUDITH B. JONES, JOSEPH P. ATKINS and PAUL B. DEWOLFE |
| KENNETH HINTON |
| 20-7047 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-01519-GJH. Mailed to: Kenneth Hinton. [20-7047] TW [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:18 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 6 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Kenneth Hinton. [1000789280] [20-7047] TW [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Kenneth Hinton to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6]. Date and method of service: 08/05/2020 US mail. [1000789279] [20-7047] TW [Entered: 08/07/2020 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-01519-GJH. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. [20-7047] TW [Entered: 07/23/2020 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 08/10/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-7047] MR [Entered: 07/17/2020 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Kenneth Hinton ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days.. [20-7047] MR [Entered: 07/17/2020 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 07/31/2020. [20-7047] MR [Entered: 07/17/2020 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:20-cv-01519-GJH. Case manager: MRadday. [20-7047] MR [Entered: 07/17/2020 08:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
