US v. David Mero
| DAVID MERO |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 20-7070 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: David Mero. Informal Opening Brief due 08/17/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-7070] RE [Entered: 07/22/2020 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:17-cr-00013-MSD-RJK-1. Case manager: REdwards. Date notice of appeal filed: 07/20/2020 [20-7070] RE [Entered: 07/22/2020 08:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. David Mero | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DAVID MERO | |
| Represented By: | David Mero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Kaitlin Gratton Cooke Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
