Terry Thompson v. Charles Opoku
| TERRY THOMPSON |
| CORIZON, INCORPORATED, SABA ASRAT, DEAN GADSON, ALIESHA HAYNES, WILLIAM LEWIS, KURT MOORE, DERRICK GARNETT, ANDREW JACKSON, CHARLES OPOKU, TYLECIA RENE, DANIEL MORGAN and STEPHEN STANBACK |
| 20-7243 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01022-ELH. Mailed to: Thompson. [20-7243] AW [Entered: 10/16/2020 08:40 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Thompson. [1000830508] [20-7243] AW [Entered: 10/16/2020 08:37 AM]
|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Terry Thompson re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Thompson. [20-7243] AW [Entered: 09/21/2020 07:02 AM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Thompson, Greiss, Grossi. Informal Opening Brief due 09/18/2020 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [20-7243] AW [Entered: 08/25/2020 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Terry Thompson ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Thompson, Greiss, Grossi [20-7243] AW [Entered: 08/25/2020 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:18-cv-01022-ELH. Case manager: AWalker. [20-7243] AW [Entered: 08/25/2020 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
