Stephen Cooke, Jr. v. Allen Gang
Respondent / Appellee: MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and ALLEN GANG, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: STEPHEN M. COOKE, JR.
Case Number: 20-7325
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 7, 2023 Stephen Cooke, Jr. v. Allen Gang

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2020 Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Nicholas G. Madiou for Stephen M. Cooke, Jr.. [1000817628] [20-7325] Nicholas Madiou [Entered: 09/25/2020 10:01 AM]
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 6 ]. Number of days granted: 42. Informal Opening Brief due 11/13/2020. Copies to all parties.. [1000816294] [20-7325] MR [Entered: 09/23/2020 03:31 PM]
September 23, 2020 Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Michael E. Lawlor for Stephen M. Cooke, Jr.. [1000816191] [20-7325] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 09/23/2020 02:35 PM]
September 22, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION by Stephen M. Cooke, Jr. to extend filing time for informal opening brief.. Date and method of service: 09/22/2020 ecf. [1000815416] [20-7325] Michael Lawlor [Entered: 09/22/2020 03:21 PM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court record (paper) requested? N/A. [20-7325] MR [Entered: 09/09/2020 11:52 AM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 4 (PARTIAL) ASSEMBLED ELECTRONIC RECORD docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-03256-SAG. Record in folder? Yes. Record reviewed? Yes. PSR included? N/A. State court paper record requested in 2254 case?N/A [20-7325] MR [Entered: 09/09/2020 11:52 AM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed.. Informal Opening Brief due 10/02/2020 [20-7325] MR [Entered: 09/08/2020 10:37 AM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 09/22/2020. [20-7325] MR [Entered: 09/08/2020 10:36 AM]
September 8, 2020 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cv-03256-SAG. Date notice of appeal filed: 09/03/2020. Case manager: MRadday. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [20-7325] MR [Entered: 09/08/2020 10:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Cooke, Jr. v. Allen Gang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Daniel John Jawor
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ALLEN GANG, Warden
Represented By: Daniel John Jawor
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: STEPHEN M. COOKE, JR.
Represented By: Michael E. Lawlor
Represented By: Nicholas George Madiou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?